Showing posts with label tamil movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tamil movies. Show all posts

The Prince & Me 3: A Royal Honeymoon (2008)

The Prince & Me 3: A Royal HoneymoonI purchased this item for a friend who was a massive fan of the first 2 DVDs in this series. Unfortunately, neither of us liked the third installment. I really hope they don't make anymore because it seems they got worse as they went along. The first movie was fantastic and the second was a 'typical sequel' which didn't quite live up to the first's reputation but was still enjoyable. Now, the third movie is almost a complete flop. The scenery is great, so that's one good thing. The acting is believable so that's good too. But the switch in actors throughout the movies brings a noticable change in acting styles. I guess the biggest problem is that I'm comparing this to the first one with Julia Stiles which I really enjoyed. Maybe this movie would appeal to some as a 'stand alone' movie without being compared to the previous ones? If you erase the movie's history, you may well find this a delightful movie!

i enjoyed prince and me 3 but was expecting the same actor to play the prince. he does look like the same one but the action was not quite the same. the story line was workable.

Buy The Prince & Me 3: A Royal Honeymoon (2008) Now

This third installment of 'The Prince and Me" trilogy is truly mind-numbing. The first was corny and improbable but had a certain escapist charm owing to the lead actors, Julia Stiles and Luke Mably. Number two was a hoot; so stupid it left one gasping for air. Number three has arrived and is giving its immediate predecessor a run for it's money. The main characters have now both been replaced, which is merciful for the reputations of the original cast members; the performances of the new 'royal couple' should give hope to amateur thespians everywhere but those two should seriously contemplate working at the local mall. Having said that though we bought it for a laugh and we aren't disappointed!

Read Best Reviews of The Prince & Me 3: A Royal Honeymoon (2008) Here

THIS IS NUMBER THREE IN THE SERIES AND EACH ONE IS WORSE THAN THE PREVIOUS.

Want The Prince & Me 3: A Royal Honeymoon (2008) Discount?

The Prince and Me 3 was actually somewhat better than the second one in the series. The major positive difference was that the actor playing the King appeared to actually want to be there. In The Prince and Me 2 it was fairly obvious that Luke Mably did NOT want to be in the film.

The major negative difference was the terrible, awful, worst I have ever seen actor they found to play the Scott character. I can't think of another actor (and here I use the word actor loosely) that came near the swfulness of this guy. Where did they find this guy? He had no sense of the flow of the movie. He most reminded me of someone whose idea of acting was to stand in front of a camera and say his lines.

Without the actor playing Scott this movie would have stood a chance. Not even close to the original Prince and Me with Julia Stiles but still much better than the second one. Kam Heskin was much better in this one and the director paid attention to details unlike number 2.

I still can't recommend it unless you are simply into the series. Fingers crossed and number 4 will be a bit better still.

Save 28% Off

The Switch (2010)

The SwitchEvery so often there comes along a movie that most mainstream critics just don't like and I do. The Switch is one of those movies. Far nicer and sweeter than I expected, you may not LOVE this movie, but if it doesn't make you smile, there is something wrong with you.

Jennifer Aniston plays Kassie, a woman who is tired of waiting on a seemingly non-existent Mr. Right to start a family. She decides to find a donor who is tall and has a good sense of humor (traits not possessed by her best friend, the neurotic Wally (Jason Bateman)) and hold a very special gathering for friends and family. At this "insemination party", a very drunk Wally decides to 'switch' her donor's ingredient for his own, thus secretly hijacking her pregnancy. Fast-forward seven years and we meet Sebastian, Kassie's child, who is becoming more and more like his real father Wally by the day.

There is an underlying sad tension building all throughout the movie as we wait for the moment when Wally will put two and two together and remember what he did that fateful night, and then when he must reveal this dirty secret to Kassie. My guess is this is why some critics didn't like it. If you go into it with a better perspective though, it is more about how Wally decides he is ready to commit to this young child as a father, and how he is a better person for it, regardless of how everything ends up. A couple of scenes are downright touching, and the ending, while somewhat rushed and flawed, didn't ruin the story. I was not expecting much and in return got a whole lot.

I'm a rom-com junkie who's mighty frustrated with the genre--how can most of these films be sub-par? doesn't that go against the rules of statistics?--and yet I must say I was pleasantly surprised by The Switch. It's a cut above the norm, mostly because of the relationship between father and son, which is warmly, sweetly, comedically and endearingly acted.

This film is Hollywood; despite a strange lull after the "switch" which suggests the pacing might go indie, it returns to Hollywood momentum. Which is fine, but the editing is slightly off there. That said, the charm and comedy of the father and son really do make this movie. I'm not into the standard manipulation of cute faces and piping voices for ratings, but these two are really sweet magic together.

Bateman's acting is touchingly understated when he's with the kid; the child (Thomas Robinson) is earnest and adorable and is so natural in his connection with his father. Aniston picks up credibility in a few of the intimate moments she has with Bateman--you feel her looking at him and being moved and wanting/wondering--but overall this really is a Bateman/Robinson movie.

I don't dislike Aniston in general, but I absolutely didn't "feel" her the way I did the other two. The movie has the usual Hollywood stock characters for best friends; Jeff Goldblum is amusing in a slightly quieter way than usual. But it's Bateman and Robinson, as a duo and separately, that make the movie a four star in its genre--and that make you long for the Bateman/Aniston characters to live happily ever after.

I rented it thinking it would be bad fluff. I watched it half-over again later that night, just to laugh and love a bit more with the father/son duo, and now I'm going to buy it for real. This isn't going to be the best romantic comedy you'll have ever watched (I hope), but it's not at all a bad way to spend a couple hours. :)

Buy The Switch (2010) Now

THE SWITCH is another story about artificial insemination and the impact it has on the participants. Yes, it has been done many times with varying results, but what makes this version of the story different and worthy of merit and attention is the sparkling screenplay by Allan Loeb adapted from the short story 'Baster' by gifted author Jeffrey Eugenides ('Middlesex', 'The Virgin Suicides', 'My Mistress's Sparrow is Dead', and short stories 'The Speed of Sperm', 'Air Mail', 'Ancient Myths', etc). It is a film that gives us the opportunity to remember the fine comic time of Jeff Goldblum, Jennifer Aniston, Jason Bateman, and Juliet Lewis, courtesy of the fine direction by Josh Gordon and Will Speck..

Wally Mars (Jason Bateman) is an oddly neurotic character who has a very difficult time connecting to people, especially in the dating department. His best friend is Kassie Larson (Jennifer Aniston) a successful woman who abruptly decides her biologic clock is ticking down and decides to have a baby by paying a sperm donor. Wally is shocked, but Kassie's other best friend Debbie (Juliette Lewis, bubbling brilliantly) supports her conviction to take charge of her life and plans a party to celebrate Kassie's incipient 'donation'. Kassie selects a potential donor in Roland (Patrick Wilson) who is a square and married teacher but 'needs the money'. At the party when the 'donation' is to be deposited, Wally gets drunk and accidentally spills Roland's 'contribution', and in drunken desperation replaces it with his own a secret he doesn't even share with Leonard (Jeff Goldblum) with whom he works and has a strong friendship. The inseminated Kassie moves back home, returning seven years later with her six-year old son Sebastian (Thomas Robinson, a very fine child actor). Kassie courts the now divorced Roland, a blow to Wally who in his 'babysitting' chores grows close to Sebastian who is very much like Wally. How the story ends is predictable but heartwarmingly humorous, especially watching the relationship between Wally and Sebastian develop.

In addition to the strong cast of leading actors there are cameos by Kelli Barrett and especially the significantly impressive Scott Elrod (watch this young actor's career blossom!). Largely due to the smart dialogue delivered by specialists in comedy, this film works well. Grady Harp, March 11

Read Best Reviews of The Switch (2010) Here

"The Switch" is charming and light fare and keeps your interest through a few cliche scenes. It takes a leap of faith to believe the premise, but once the story starts it hooks you with interest about what will happen to a little boy who wants to know who his father is.

"Switch" is a story of an unmarried 40 year old woman, Kassie, (Jennifer Aniston), who has her donor sperm switched without her knowing. At the artificial insemination party the donor (Patrick Wilson) and his wife talk to her best man friend, Wally, (Jason Bateman) about the decision to help Kassie become a mother. Wally secretly loves her and becomes upset and gets down and out drunk. When he uses the restroom, he inadvertently spills the donor "seed" and replaces it with his without, Kassie, the future mother knowing.

Seven years later, Kassie reunites with Wally, her best friend, who has been keeping his fatherhood a secret. He becomes best buddies with their child and has renewed love for his former girlfriend. Patrick Wilson plays Roland, the other love interest, he reminded me of a young Paul Newman, and Jeff Goldblum plays Wally's Boss and confidant.

I especially liked the six year old boy, played by Thomas Robinson.

The story is interesting, implausible, and predictable, but works as a light-hearted end of summer movie.

Want The Switch (2010) Discount?

I watched this movie because I'm a fan of Jason Bateman. Obviously, the premise has been done before so I didn't have high expectaions other than enjoying his performance. I was pleasantly surprised though. I found it quite enjoyable. I think the cast really made it. I really like understated and dry humor and they pulled it of well. You aren't going to be blown away by this kind of story but it is very entertaining and well done... which honestly, I find to be be rare in movies these days. Bateman is VERY endearing, as is the the little boy, who did an amazing job. I even enjoyed Anniston:) I wish there had been more scenes fleshing out the realtionship between the two main characters because it had a nice "When Harry Met Sally" vibe to it. All in all, well worth it!

Save 39% Off

Au Pair Girls (1972)

Au Pair GirlsThe Au Pair Girls is somewhat dated but the dialogue is so bad it is entertaining. The girls show off their bodies throughout the film in the most contrived and "innocent ways". One of the Star Au Pair Girls was played by Actress Gabrielle Drake. She played a staring role in the Gerry Anderson TV series UFO as Lt Gay Ellis. Gabrielle Drake bares all in the Au Pair Girls. It is worth a look.

This film falls into the category of a victimless 'guilty pleasure'. Sort of like sneaking in a chocolate bar while you're on a diet. The Au Pair Girls is British exploitation, plain and simple, with a nifty 70's twist. It was a hoot just to see the various fashions and hairstyles that were popular at the time. And a bit of a surprise to see full frontal nudity, considering the year it was released (1972). There's not much of a plot, it basically covers 24 hours in the lives of 4 young women who arrive in England to start their new lives as au pairs.

Your first tip-off that this film isn't exactly a top shelf production happens about 6 minutes into the movie. As the au pair girls are arriving at the agency, a man directs them to an elevator. To the right, a flight of stairs. As German lovely Christa (Nancie Wait) arrives, you can actually see the shadow of a boom microphone on the wall at the top of the stairs. This gaff is made all the more humorous by the fact that only music is heard at this scene, no dialogue.

I got the film basically for one reason: Gabrielle Drake. I had a terrible crush on her as a kid, watching her in the role of Lt. Ellis, one of the purple-haired dolls on the moonbase in the short-lived sci-fi series 'UFO'. She didn't disappoint here, leaving precious little to the imagination. Le Le May, also known as Nan Lee, Le Le Mai and half a dozen other names, is also an eyeful. The Burma-born beauty had the least 'skin time' of the four, but she had more prominent roles in the cheesy Italian schlock films like 'Man From Deep River', and 'Jungle Holocaust'. Nancie Wait looks nice as the German virgin, Christa. The daughter of the couple who she's staying with, Carole, decides to give her a night she'll never forget by introducing the innocent au pair to rock singer Ricky Strange, an obvious, but laughable imitation of Jim Morrison. In the film's only truly emotional and touching scene, after a passionate fling with Ricky, Christa then sees him fall into the arms of his open-minded girlfriend, the aforementioned Carole, for more lovemaking. Christa collapses in tears, realizing that she has just been used and what was supposed to be a 'special night', has been robbed from her forever. The final au pair, played by Astrid Frank, to me, was the least attractive, as a woman and a character in the movie. After watching her, I have a good idea how all the 'dumb blonde' jokes got started. She was just too stupid to be likeable.

All in all, if you like nostalgic 'naughty' films from the silly 70's, this one should fit the bill nicely. Mostly an excuse for a T&A show, but an enjoyable one.

Buy Au Pair Girls (1972) Now

I remember seeing this at the pictures (having bunked in, because I was too young).

I thought it was very funny at the time and that Gabrielle Drake was stunning.

Well, that sort of 'Mind Your Language' come 'Adventures of ...' humour has dated beyond recollection of anything amusing.

But it was well worth the dosh just to see Gabrielle Drake in all her glory again.

Read Best Reviews of Au Pair Girls (1972) Here

Silly stuff in the vein of the Carry On series of extended comedy sketches turned into sometimes laborious movies.

And as such, expect stereotypical characters reciting predictable lines in tried, tested and silly situations.

What makes it intriguing is that the film does not shy away from showing flesh atypically, when a 'risqué' situation arises, instead of alluding to the exposed breast, bottom or pussy, it is just shown, sometimes longer than needed. I imagine for it's era, that was unusual.

And also stereotypically, only the girls are treated in that fashion. I don't recall any male nudity.

Why did I watch it? I think our society's hang-ups around sex and nakedness are problematic, and movies that manifest differently are intriguing.

Is this a movie that alters the conversation in this realm? Only in that by not shying away from showing what is taboo and treating it as normal, albeit with dysfunctional on-screen reactions to those situations.

Bottom line: it's silly and naked girls are shown in silly situations, never explicitly.

Want Au Pair Girls (1972) Discount?

Felt like I was back in the 50's watching "Father Knows Best," or "Leave it to Beaver." If you like nostalgia, this movie's for you.

Save 36% Off