Not the Messiah: He's a Very Naughty Boy (2010)

Not the Messiah: He's a Very Naughty BoyAt the outset, I must admit that my view on this piece may be slightly prejudiced seeing as I was fortunate enough to have been in attendance at the Royal Albert Hall that wonderful night and saw this live.

Having been there and having seen this already, and that as a Python fan since 1973, I can not imagine not having this in my DVD library.

The sad truth is that it is rare for these amazing and gifted performers to get together at all as time goes on and since they are all in their late 60's (at best) future reunions are not quite bloody likely, so gang let's enjoy them while they are here. The only regrettable thing is that the great John Cleese chose not to participate in the grand evening.

The concert performance of HE'S NOT THE MESSIAH, HE'S A VERY NAUGHTY BOY is quite fun. Written by Eric Idle and Jon Du Prez (One Foot in the Grave) and accompanied by a rather impressive choir and the BBC orchestra is a adrenaline shot that most of us geezers-in-waiting really need.

Treasured moments include seeing the look on Eric Idle's face as he sees 6 Gumby's in the front row. Also a great deal of fun is the first appearance of "Mrs. Betty Palin". Not too mention the first note and the audience reaction as the orchestra begins THE LIBERTY BELL MARCH. Although the main focus of the evening is HE'S NOT THE MESSIAH, what Python "reunion" would be complete without a sing a long to conclude the evening.

This DVD is a must for all Python fans!!!!!!!!!

Apparently I am the lone Python fan here who was not only less than thrilled by this show, but almost bored silly.

My MP credentials had me ready for hilarity: I've seen Brian dozens of times since the week it came out and know it pretty much word for word; love the Pythons in general, have seen all the tv shows many times and all the movies many times; have all the records and most all the '70s books, even the rare ones that only Cleese's Mum ever read; love their sense of humor in general and consider them some of the funniest and most literate of all comedians. So, you know, I was well disposed to liking this.

But, at the risk of being a heretic like Brian, and attacked for not agreeing with the herd here ("Stone him! Stone him!!"), I found Not The Messiah to be Not The Greatest, and possibly Yes The Worst Of All (Ever-Increasing In Number) Tertiarily Semi-Pythonic, Sadly Ironic, Somewhat Related, Eric Idleberg-hatched Further Chances To Milk The Python Catalogue.

"Spamalot made a LOT of money! What might we do next along that line?"

"Nothing, Eric. Bugger off. Python is over. Let it go. Haven't you enough money yet?"

"But John, the others have all agreed to do guest spots!"

"That's wonderful, Eric, and I wish you well, but I'd rather not be part of something that's a little too close to the sort of non-stop merchandising we used to mock on the BBC 40 years ago. All the best, but please don't call me for the next project, either. And we all know there WILL be a next one, Eric. You have indeed found a goldmine here. You can market the old bits with new window dressing to the old fans who will do anything to relive the glory days, and that's wonderful, but really....those bits have been done. Move on. Write something completely new. Let it all rest in peace."

"OK, John , but you're really missing out on something special here. We've got a whole symphony and everything! It's been tarted up to a whole new level of tarted-uppedness! It's ironic, it's meta-ironic, it's us laughing at us laughing at them laughing at us laughing at them for still paying more and more to see the same thing over and over! It's brilliant, John!

We'll also be getting 80% of the gross from the wolf nipple chips sold at intermission!

John!

John?"

Watched this with a fellow Python fanatic who was similarly non-enchanted if not disenchanted. We just didn't feel it. A few clever ideas, but it all felt forced and non-Pythonic, lacking the ensemble immediacy and genius writing that distinguished the Pythons. This just feels like another Broadway profit scheme. The singing is good, the symphony is good, but we just didn't laugh, were never surprised, and got none of that special Python feeling that the classics always deliver, time after time. The writing plus the group interplay is what made Python Python, and that was a team effort, even when they wrote in pairs or alone. This is just Idle without any contrasting input, and the group interplay is sorely absent. Idle on his own is simply not that hilarious any more, and he knows it, so he uses the mighty Python name to keep his career alive. Oops, sorry squire, I said it.

But each to their own. I would hope the average Python fan will accept that there are some among their number who are allowed to not worship every new, not-new-at-all Python project to dribble out of Eric's ledgerbook. Nudge, know what I mean?

In a nutshell, if this project sounds to you like the greatest idea since sliced Spam, perhaps for you it will be.

And if it sounds to you like another cash-in from Idle that lacks much if any of the old Python magic, perhaps for you it will be.

All in all, I prefer the Venezuelan beaver cheese.

Buy Not the Messiah: He's a Very Naughty Boy (2010) Now

When it comes to "behind the scenes" material about a live production, you can't get any better than this short piece about the week leading up to the performance of "Not the Messiah" to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the "Monty Python" TV series. I really appreciated seeing short insights into the casting of the solo roles and the composition of some of the pieces, the amount of rehearsal it took, as well as hearing their un-polished thoughts on the entire rehearsal process. Composer John Du Prez's words about the musical choices are golden; I only wish that more focus had been placed on it. In fact, for a true Python geek or classical music geek, there probably should have been an entirely separate video about how the songs were composed and perhaps a different video on the first performance in Toronto.

Read Best Reviews of Not the Messiah: He's a Very Naughty Boy (2010) Here

My husband (the original Monty Python fan in the family) and I stumbled across this DVD and now having watched it, I'm ever so glad we did.

First and foremost if you have any hesistation, buy it.

Secondly, I think it's the best 'concert' dvd I've ever seen. The lighting is stunning, the costumes are perfect, the staging is wonderful, the singers are brilliant and it's vintage Python. I'm in professional theatre (a stage manager) and I was absolutely blown away.

The only dissapointment I had and I know this is my opinion only was that I wasn't impressed with Rosalind Plowright (the lady wearing the blue dress who plays Brian's mother). I don't happen to like her voice, but that's just me.

I won't spill any beans for those of you who haven't seen it, and for those folks who were lucky enough to be in attendance it captures the excitement, passion and love of Python. I've never seen a live event filmed, then watched vhs or dvd that was able to do that.

Want Not the Messiah: He's a Very Naughty Boy (2010) Discount?

Call me weird, but I saw this *before* I saw Life of Brian, even though I've been a Python fan all my life. It just never came up. I laughed a lot while watching this DVD, and the various appearances of many of the old gang was awesome. There was one thing, however, that irritated me to the point of anger. I apologize in advance for random capsing, but seriously people. Seriously.

Whoever was filming/editing this forgot that Carol Cleveland was just as much a part of the Monty Python experience as anyone, and she was completely skipped over. When she came in with the sheep costume I had to rewind to be sure it was really her so quickly did they take the camera off her. I was so excited to see that she was featured, but the camera spent that WHOLE NUMBER looking at the stupid sheep puppets and the choir. Yeah it was a funny image for the first twenty seconds, but Carol Cleveland, not a substitute, not a look-alike, the REAL LADY who played so many of the genuine female parts on that show for YEARS got ignored. Why? To what purpose? Surely they knew who she was. I'm pretty sure the crowd recognized her. I just don't get it.

We'd rather spend almost an hour looking at Michael Palin in a dress but the awesome lady who could hold it together with those guys gets a few seconds of screentime? Any of the parts she rocked? The actress from Scott Of The Antarctic? The Science Fiction Sketch? "But it's my only line!" She was Zoot and her twin in Holy Grail for heaven's sake! That should mean something!

For shame! Editors, director, Python men, for shame for not making sure one of your troupe members was featured. Carol Cleveland, you are still awesome and deserved better representation.

As for the show itself, several of the songs seemed to go on *forever* but many were funny and catchy. I still find myself singing "What Have The Romans Ever Done For Us?" as it makes for a pretty good generic statement of irony. All in all it's an amusing conceit and it looked like everyone involved had a really good time doing it, and that can make up for a lot of genre shock.

Save 56% Off

0 comments:

Post a Comment