Showing posts with label old comedy hindi movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label old comedy hindi movies. Show all posts

Big Daddy (1999)

Big DaddyMy initial impression based on the trailer was that this would be another crass Sandler flick (Sandler is cool, don't get me wrong), but might have potential. I was surprised It was very good! Adam Sandler adopts a 5-year-old boy to prove to his girlfriend he's ready for the next stage of his life. She dumps him anyway, and Sandler realizes that he doesn't know what he's doing, and so tries to give the kid back. While he's got him, though, they do all sorts of crazy things and have a lot of fun. Rob Schneider provides excellent comic relief, as does Steve Buscemi, who has a cameo in this film. In short, a normally irresponsible man grows up by having to deal with the joys of parenthood. A thumbs-up for heart, and two thumbs up for humor and entertainment! Special features include an HBO First Look which is worthwhile viewing.

The review from "The New Yorker" on this page is probably one of the most pompous and hollow reviews I've ever read. "Big Daddy" is a great movie. I'm a long-time Adam Sandler fan but, put it this way, after seeing this movie, so is my mother. She's usually not into this kind of comedy, but this has become one of her all-time favorite movies. So, saying that "Anyone looking to solve the mystery of Adam Sandler's mass appeal is not going to do it here" seems to be a ridiculous statement.

The movie is funny from "all angles". The story is good, the cast is as solid as I've ever seen in a comedy, etc, etc... Whether or not you're usually into Sandler's brand of comedy, you will most likely appreciate this film. I feel that this is Adam Sandler at his best and it is certainly one of his most successful projects.

Highly recommended.

Buy Big Daddy (1999) Now

This movie is funny. The little boys are cute. In case you didn't know the little boy in the movie is actually twin boys acting the part. I think everyone who likes Adams movies should watch this.

Read Best Reviews of Big Daddy (1999) Here

Sonny Koufax is 32 years old. He's a law school graduate. He's got a nice apartment in Manhattan. There's just one problem. He does nothing, except sit on his butt and live off an investment that was the result of a meager lawsuit he won a year ago. But after his fed up girlfriend leaves him, he comes up with the ingenious idea to adopt a five year old boy to showcase his newfound maturity. But things don't go as planned, and Sonny finds himself the unlikely foster father that will change his perspective on just looking out for himself. This is a great movie and it will make you laugh. I would recommend this to anyone who like to laugh.

Want Big Daddy (1999) Discount?

my parents got 5-6 copies of this movie because its my dad and I's favorite. I HAD to get a copy for myself! its my alltime fave! I LOVE adam sandler and the twin boys do a great job!

Save 60% Off

Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001)

Jay and Silent Bob Strike BackThis movie was a blast, but you know that already. Read on for the

details of this fully-loaded DVD edition:

Feature Commentary Track

w/ Kevin Smith, Scott Mosier and Jason Mewes; Deleted Scenes

with Intros by Kevin Smith and members of the View Askew family; -

Jay & Silent Bob's Secret Stash w/Intros; Gag Reel w/Intro;

Internet Trailers w/Intro; TV Spots; Still

Galleries; Storyboards; Behind The Scenes Featurette;

"Morris Day and The Time Learnin' the Moves"

Featurette;

Afroman "Because I Got High" video; -

Stroke 9 "Kick Some Ass" video; Comedy Central's Reel

Comedy special; Cast and Crew Filmographies; Guide to

Morris Day and The Time; Some DVD-ROM goodies Widescreen

(2.35:1) Enhanced for 16:9 Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound -

Special DVD Mix French Language Track; Spanish Subtitles

I've always heard that if you look beneath the grimy setup you'll see the beautiful interior. Well that saying is not dissimilar to the horrors of the summer movie season 2001! Some of the most anticipated flicks of the summer are huge dissappointments (ie. Scary Movie 2) and some of the best moves, the general audience are too ignorant to set foot in (ie Hedwig and the Angry Inch). Well thank god we can still depend on the rapier wit of Kevin Smith. the King of Curse Words and verbal fluency. Has given us the most entertaining installment in the View Askewniverse. Well I know it ain't saying much but "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is the funniest film of the summer!!

This film has all the things that make a screwball comedy perfect. Wacky Characters, Funny jokes both verbal and physical, Good storyline, great comic timing, and of course, a monkey.

Many people were afraid that Jay and Silent Bob would be unable to handle a movie on their own. Well not only did they succeed they went through the roof!!! Kevin Smith kept the jokes piled, one on top of the other and each one different and original. Though I loathe bodily function jokes, Smith managed to make them appropriate and not over use them, unlike the comically declined Wayans Brothers, who seem to think making the characters fart is like printing money. Smith on ther other hand keeps you on your toes awaiting what's gonna happen next.

"Is Jay Gonna Do What I think He's Gonna Do?" "If Silent Bob Speaks What will he say?"

Questions like that were popping in my brain because of the aggressive spontaneity of the comedy. But another thing I loved was all our old friends from the View Askewniverse (Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy and one omnipotent female from Dogma.) Dante, Randal, Brodie, Holden, Banky, and even Willam the idiot Man-child. All performed once again be the same View Askew alumni and all played to perfection. And to go with them there's also stellar performances by many new faces, like Shannen Elizabeth as Jay's love-intrest Justice and also Eliza Dushku, Ali Larter, and Jen Schwalbach (Mrs. Kevin Smith) as the evil villainesses. And including great cameos by George Carlin, Marc Blucas, Seann William Scott, Jason Biggs, James Van Der Beek And God knows how many more. (She does know)

I think Every self respecting View askew fan Is required by cinematic Law to get up off their butts and see this flick. And all those poor schmucks who think The Wayans Brothers actually care about originality, NEED to watch this movie or I'll Beat the ever lovin' tar outta them.

Now I can say there were 5 good movies this summer instead of 4.

And Oh Yeah, To Jay and Silent Bob: Snooch to the Nooch and Good Bye My friends

Buy Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001) Now

a lot of cursing if your sensetive to that but the rest is so fuuny (especially the scooby doo part!) best line

Jay (rapping)30 bucks little man, put that sh** in my hand!

Read Best Reviews of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001) Here

Who'd have anticipated it? I grew up never needing to be told "just say no to drugs". I always focused on serious subjects when contemplating what movies I'd make given a chance. And now I find myself in a world where the most innocent cinematic diversion are often silly farces about potheads. The riotous hoot "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is a prime example. I wasn't sure about it all the way through. Ali Larter was recently one of my favorite actresses. At least she doesn't take such a disastrous fall herein as Kirsten Dunst did in "The Virgin Suicides". Refreshingly, Ali's character Chrissie admits to being a "bad girl cliche". She gave me pause by repreating a frequent movie assertion (hopefully strictly an urban legend) about what girls don't do. But she gives a new twist, belying the claim at a point where she nearly dooms herself and co-consrirators thereby. Hence one could make a rhyme about her role: "Ali Larter plays the ......" All in all, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is one of the most surprising bits of comic relief I've seen lately.

Want Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001) Discount?

First and most importantly, you have to be very well prepared to watch "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" if you want to have any hope of enjoying it to its full potential (assume, for the sake of argument, that this is both possible and desirable). Not only do you need to watch all of writer-director Kevin Smith's earlier films (to wit, "Clerks," "Mallrats," "Chasing Amy" and "Dogma"), but you also need to have seen "American Pie," watched enough "Dawson's Creek" to know why Dawson should drown Pacey in the creek, and at least recognize every film Ben Affleck and Matt Damon have made in the past decade (know the title and a one line synopsis of what the film is about).

You need to do this for two reasons. First, it is the only way you can get all of the in-jokes in this film, which is heavily self-referential vis-a-vis the Smith oeuvre. In fact, you are better off using one hand to tick off the names of all the people from Smith's earlier films who are NOT in this movie (Stan "the Man" Lee immediately springs to mind). Second, you will need all this knowledge to be able to explain to the person next to you why Ben Affleck sometimes is playing himself, sometimes is playing somebody else (Holden McNeill from "Chasing Amy"), and sometimes is playing himself playing somebody else (Chuckie from "Good Will Hunting II: Hunting Season").

"Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is another one of those films where two guys go off to Hollywood to stop tinsel town from ruining their good reputations with a film. Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Kevin Smith) have always played small but pivotal roles in Smith's films (e.g., the "Chasing Amy" speech in "Chasing Amy"), but this time they not only get to be ABOVE the title of the film, they get to be IN the title of the film. Now, I will readily admit that I have always been one of those who could take Jay and Silent Bob in small doses, which probably explains why my favorite bits in this film usually involve other characters. However, I will admit enjoying Jay's attempt to find a nonderogatory term for women.

I have the feeling that this film is the swan song for Jay and Silent Bob. I mean, now that they have achieved titular glory, how can they go back to being the two man Greek chorus of Smith's prolonged "New Jersey Trilogy." Besides, with the appearance of virtually everyone who every appeared in a View Askew production (always good to see Joey Lauren Adams whether she is playing Alyssa Jones or not), you get the feeling the entire film is setting up a "Revenge of the Jedi" curtain call. Maybe Kevin Smith is turning a giant corner and about to start a new chapter in his life. Hey, it could happen. But I really get the feeling we have seen the last of Banky, Brody and the rest of the boys. Besides, Silent Bob speaks TWICE in this one, surely one of the signs that the end of days is nigh.

Like most View Askew productions, "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is rated R for nonstop crude and sexual humor, pervasive strong language, and drug content (Actually, I did not know that the MPAA could use a word like "nonstop" in its description of a film, but certainly the term applies to everything on their little list here). So just remember to go back over Smith's earlier films before you screen this one and save yourself a lot of headaches and avoid watching it with anyone who is going to demand you justify your enjoyment every other expletive out of Jay's mouth.

Save 27% Off

One for the Money (2012)

One for the MoneyAs a fan of the books, I was not expecting very much. You know how it is. Someone in Hollywood reads maybe a chapter and half and then goes to town and puts a ton of their own ideas in, changes names and does a real hack job on the book we all know and loved. This DID NOT happen here at all. The movie exceeded my expectations in every possible way.

The basic plot is that Stephanie Plum of Trenton New Jersey has recently (okay---six months ago) lost her job, has a bunch of bills and rent to pay and needs some fast cash. She blackmails her cousin Vinnie into giving her a job at his bail bonds business as a recovery agent (okay---bounty hunter). He'd prefer to just assign her the easier stuff (naked flasher ftas) but she wants to go after the big money, trenton cop, Joe Morelli, with whom Stephanie has shared some intimate moments (okay---one intimate moment)in the past.

I'm not going to spoil too much with this review, I'm just going to address the things that I would have wanted to know before going to see this film.

First, I was not very happy when Katherine Heigl was cast as Stephanie. I like her, but I don't think she is much of an actress. She was a great Izzie Stevens, but since then she has mostly played Izzie Stevens. But, surprisingly, she was goooood in this! She played Stephanie perfectly, and I will probably have more respect for her as an actress in the future. Stephanie herself grows up a little through the film. She becomes more assertive and she tries so hard and she remains cheerful no matter what sort of bad things happen to her. I don't think we could have recieved a better cinematic treatment of our favorite bounty hunter.

The other characters are great as well. I felt Grandma Mazur was a little too lady-like, I wish she'd been in her track suit, and had seemed a little more Grandma Mazurish, but I hope there will be a sequel or six and we will get to see her develop more. Morelli and Ranger are exactly what I hoped for. Vinnie and Connie and Lula were pretty good as well. You'll see Connie and recognize her instantly---she's entirely faithful to Janet's depiction. And yes, the man who plays Vinnie does sort of look like a weasel.

The only tiny gripe I have was that Ramierz seemed a little too sane in the movie. I understand that having that subplot in there would have probably extended the movie by at least twenty minutes, but I was so looking forward to him whispering about himself in 3rd person...and he seemed smarter in the movie, being more involved in the Jimmy Alpha operation. And of course, I wanted more Lula, but the writers were very faithful to the book and Lula was not in the first book very much. You can't have your cake and eat it too, I guess.

The last thing I have to say is that the people who wrote the script obviously spent a lot of time reading the books and there were plently of details in there that a fan will recognize and appreciate. As Stephanie scrolls through her phone, we see the number for Pino's Pizza, Rex is in her kitchen always running on his wheel, Lula says she'll talk more if Stephanie brings her a snack, Lula tells Jackie it's hot and she's hungry (always), Ranger and Morelli refer to Stephanie as "Babe" and "Cupcake," respectively, and there are a lot of other little details that I can't remember just now, but which helped the movie to have the feel of the books. I love it so much when a movie is adapted this well. I cannot wait to see this again, and I really hope there are is a sequel which remains as true to the series as this one. I cannot say enough good things about this movie! Go and see it soon, it will not dissapoint you.

Okay, so the casting doesn't meet your expectations. How can it? We all picture someone different in the roles. I wanted a sexier Ranger, a fatter Lula, a Danny DaVito for Vinny, and an Estelle Getty for Grandma Mazur. But all in all it was very enjoyable. I read a reviewer who said that Rex didn't seem to like Stephanie. Really? That's your review? The movie followed the book, the actors did a great job,and all Janet E fans will love this movie. Not every story has to have a tough modern woman as the lead. Morelli's last scene at Stef's front door put a smile on my face. Enjoy it for what it is.

Buy One for the Money (2012) Now

I've only read a few of the books, so I'm maybe not the best judge of how well this was pulled off. That said, Katherine Heigl surprised me by playing someone a lot more like Stephanie Plum than like the other characters Heigl has played. I enjoyed watching her character (Stephanie) grow and become steadily more competent (if still unsure) in her new role as a recovery agent. For those who haven't read the books, the main culprit may be a surprise because of the way things were played.

All in all, I enjoyed it enough that, if there were a sequel, I'd watch it.

Read Best Reviews of One for the Money (2012) Here

I loved the first twelve Plum books so I was hoping I would enjoy seeing the characters come to life on the silver screen but sadly that was not the case. My first issue is with the casting which is beyond awful! Katherine Heigl is terrible as Stephanie; she overplays in every scene and she is completely lacking in any kind of warmth which is one of Stephanie's trademark characteristics. (Let me clear, I am comparing Stephanie and all the characters to the way they were originally wonderfully written in books 1-12 before JE started letting her daughter and ghostwriter simply slap pages together)

Heigl has zero chemistry with the men in her life or with anyone else in the movie. Jason O'Mara is not a bad actor but he was miscast as Morelli. No one so blatantly and quirkily Irish should be portraying a macho Italian cop. Sunjata also fails as Ranger...he isn't good looking enough and he lacks any of Ranger's sensuality, quiet intelligence or strength. He also gets very little screentime in the film which won't make some fans (me included) happy. Grandma Mazur is too young, too well preserved and not eccentric enough. Mr. and Mrs. Plum seem off...she's grating and he's pointless; I just couldn't buy them in their roles.

The only characters who worked were Vinnie, Connie and Lula. The plot deviates from the book and not in a good way since it minimizes the suspense and makes the ending more anti-climatic. The sets were also lackluster...not gritty enough for Trenton.

"One for the Money" was a great book but it is a terrible disappointment as a movie.

Want One for the Money (2012) Discount?

As a fan of the books, I was disappointed when I first heard who was cast in the lead roles. These books are character-driven, and need to hang on to that for a film to succeed. It's not that I thought these weren't good actors; I just didn't initially "see" them as Stephanie, Morelli and Ranger. Given slight differences for reader imagination, though, the three here did a great job. Lula is perfect--can't wait to see more of her!

The script managed to hang on to the mystery/ comedy/ romance/ action mix. Kudos to Hollywood for not ruining a perfectly good book by "improving" on the story line.

I would like to have seen Stephanie's relationship with Ranger a little more established. The spark that explains why Ranger would do all this for her was missing, making his character seem an odd fit. He pops in and out to save her with little explanation, reason or rhyme. Still, it's early days yet, and hopefully we'll see sequels that can accomplish that.

Save 34% Off

Street Fighter (Extreme Edition) (1994)

Street FighterOkay, I don't think anyone can reasonably argue that this movie is good; at least, not in any conventional sense. The acting, except for perhaps Raul Julia, is sub-par at best, the story is ridiculous, and even the fight scenes aren't very well-executed (pretty bad for a film with the title Street Fighter, huh).

So why am I giving this 5 stars? Well, for starters, I was all of 8 years old when the film came out, and deeply in love with video games, especially Street Fighter II, which this film is (loosely) based on. I also liked Jean-Claude Van Damme for some bizarre reason-Bloodsport, Hard Target, Timecop-to me, he could do no wrong. Which made this film a perfect storm of sorts. Being older and wiser, I can easily spot the many flaws in this film, but the over-the-top, cheesy dialogue, stunts, and story are what keep me loving this movie. I don't think it's good anymore, like when I did when I was eight, but now I realize it's in that rare so-terrible-it's-actually-highly-entertaining category. Just don't expect much and watch it more for laughs than a serious story (it's based on a video game for crying out loud) and you'll get a kick out of it.

I mean, how could you not love a movie that has one of the characters, watching a surveillance camera revealing a bomb-laden truck about to crash into the building he's in, exclaim, "Quick! Somebody change the channel!"

Whenever I think of video game movies, I always think of only three movies: Super Mario Brothers, Street Fighter, and Double Dragon. Perhaps because these were the first three made or perhaps because I loved all three as a kid. Either way, of those three, it's Street Fighter I seem to always think of the most as far as these kind of movies go.

Street Fighter: The Movie came out in 1994, a year after the release of Super Mario Brothers. Let's just be upfront in saying it's no where near being an Oscar worthy movie. It's probably not even really "good", at that. It's a somewhat cheesy or campy movie (but not as much as SMB and no where near as much as Double Dragon). But I've always really enjoyed the movie.

So what is the plot of the movie? This is one place I think it hurt itself with a lot of Street Fighter fans. As was once said, for a movie called Street Fighter....there's a glaring lack of street fighting, much less a tournament. I could have easily seen the movie be your standard martial arts film in that sense had they made it a bit more like the games. However, in the movie, Bison is as he is in the games: a power mad dictator out for world domination. Opposing him is the Allied Nations with Guile commanding the army. And that's basically the plot. Bison has taken a large group of people hostage and has given the world 72 hours to hand him $20 billion in ransom while the main characters set out to stop him and rescue the hostages (though they don't all come together until towards the end of the movie).

Many of the major characters from the games out at the time are in the movie as well. Ryu and Ken are a couple of con artists who rip off criminals, Sagat and Vega, both former cage fighters, operate as arms dealers for Bison, Chun Li, out to avenge her father, Balrog, who is one of the more major departures from his game counterpart, and E. Honda work as reporters, and Guile, like his game counterpart, is after Bison partially to avenge his friend Charlie who is combined with Blanka from the game as in the movie, Charlie IS Blanka. Zangief, though not like in the game, works for Bison.

I bought the blu-ray "Extreme Edition" version of the movie. Admittedly I never owned the DVD so I can't compare. But I thought the image quality was nice. I have no complaints there. There's several special features but so far I've only watched the deleted scenes. There's unfortunately only two of them and both center around Chun Li.

The only "big name" people in the movie are Raul Julia as M. Bison and Jean Claude Van Damme who plays Colonel William F. Guile. Both give good performances (as good as it can be given the circumstances). Raul Julia definitely takes the cake though as my favorite performance of the movie. It was clear he was enjoying himself with the role. It's only sad because Raul Julia died not long after the movie came out. I remember always seeing the "For Raul. Vaya con dios" at the end but never realizing what it meant (both with RJ's death and I didn't know Spanish at the time--it means go with God). Now that I do, I felt a twinge of sadness as it appeared and the credits rolled.

Another thing I've heard people didn't like about the movie is they changed the central character. In the games, Ryu is the central/main character while in the movie, it's Guile. While Guile is my favorite character (in both the games and movie), I can understand.

All in all, can you really say Street Fighter is a "good" movie? Probably not. But something about it I can't quite put my finger on has always made me really enjoy the movie. Truth be told, it's probably my favorite video game movie.

Buy Street Fighter (Extreme Edition) (1994) Now

The biggest distinction that "Street Fighter: the Movie" holds for me is that it's the first Van Damme picture I ever saw. On a global scale, it was the first video game-film adaptation to turn a buck, which should count for something despite the routine bashing it receives for how shoddily it portrayed the most popular fighting game of the time on the big screen. I was personally never a huge "Street Fighter" fan, but while I can certainly spot the plotline unfaithfulness, I can't help but notice just how fun the movie is. It's a poor adaptation and a questionable action movie, but nevertheless a decent teenaged adventure when taken at face value.

The story: when the mad warlord General M. Bison (Raul Julia, The Addams Family) is poised to overrun the earth in pursuit of his own personal empire, it will be up to a multi-faceted group of fighters including Colonel William Guile (Van Damme, Timecop), reporter Chun-Li (Ming Na, Final Fantasy The Spirits Within), and conmen Ryu Hoshi (Byron Mann, Crying Freeman) and Ken Masters (Damian Chapa) to stop him.

This film is definitely over-cast, comparable to Mortal Kombat: Annihilation in terms of saturation. No less than fifteen characters from the original two games more than half of their combined casts are featured, resulting in a stifling deficit of character development, since next to none of them have the appropriate amount of screentime for it. The actual casting choices of these characters can also be taken to task, but I'm pleased that through the admirably accurate costumes and cosmetics most of the performers at least *look* like their animated counterparts (in some cases, like Robert "Blanka" Mammone, you almost wish they didn't). Personalities and backgrounds have been addled with as expected to accommodate the tournament-free premise, but none of them bother me as much as the case of M. Bison: he's the single goofiest part of this whole immature adventure, practically a forerunner to Dr. Evil, having been written so comically that it's impossible to consider him threatening even when he's snapping guys' necks or shooting electricity from his fists.

The movie never has a problem with pacing, rolling along fittingly enough at a video game's pace and always presenting you with some silly or bombastic event to watch; it's never boring. Sadly, there's not nearly enough fighting going on, and when it does happen it's not that great. It seems amazing that, considering what it's based on, the movie only has a 'round half-dozen fights, depending on your definition of a fight (i.e. I don't consider it a fight when Guile and his team ambush some soldiers and Kylie Minogue does a cool but unnecessary pro wrestling move), and even more amazing how very bland most of them are with Benny Urquidez (Spider-Man) supplying fight choreography. Some of the performers just aren't good, and some of them surprisingly so (is this the same Damian Chapa who rocked the house with Michael Worth in U.S. Seals 2? I hope not!), but other times they just feel stifled. For example, the showdown between Ryu and Vega (Jay Tavare, Pathfinder) was my favorite of the movie, and really felt like it could've gone somewhere were it not for the cramped locker room they were in.

Apparently, the critical lashing "Street Fighter" received moved Van Damme to choose his future roles more carefully, so in a pinch, I'll accredit every good movie he did subsequently to this minor disappointment. Seeing as this particular franchise hasn't done too well in live-action film regardless of who's involved, I can't be too hard on this first attempt and will continue to regard it neutrally and enjoy it by accident every few years. Fans of the games who somehow have yet to see the film should avoid it unless they're intentionally looking for something to heckle.

Read Best Reviews of Street Fighter (Extreme Edition) (1994) Here

The 90's was a decade dominated by some of the most memorable video games ever created. Next to Madden 97 and NBA Live sat the arcade classic Street Fighter. It was a game kids lined up to play at the arcade, back when those were of more relevance. Another great thing the 90's did was make hilariously awesome B movies predominately in the action and horror genres. Amongst the action genre came a gang of horrible video game movie adaptations that just can't be touched. These movies are pure gold in the B-est way possible. The most noteworthy had to be Mario Brothers (naturally), Mortal Kombat, and our feature flick Street Fighter starring the muscles from Brussels. Any movie starring Van Damme is always a sure thing, especially when it's a video game movie. That is on par with a nice cyborg flick which you know is the tops.

Van Damme plays Col. William Guile as he leads his army into a country called Shadaloo. The armies task is to take down the evil country leader General M. Bison. All the video game characters are part of the movie, but don't actually battle it out with each other. So really it's just a really bad action movie that utilizes Street Fighter's video game characters. Hey it works for us like watching Santa squeeze into his football pants. The movie really heats up when one of Van Damme's main soldiers is kidnapped and turned into a hideous freak creature called Blanka...which was the big green guy in the video game. They train Blanka to be an ultimate killing machine by juicing him up and making him watch video clips of all crazy happenings. It's pretty similar to GnR's "Welcome to the Jungle" video just way more B. About as B as having fat Axl in the video instead. Despite all the mutating, Col. Guile is able to sooth the savage beast by saying "c'mon baby, you know you're the girl of my dreams." Then all the characters reign down blows upon Bison and his evil henchmen, with Van Damme delivery the final death blow.

It's funny that a lot of reviews panned Street Fighter in a somewhat brutal fashion. It's a wonder to comprehend what these folks were expecting in a Van Damme movie whose plot is based on a video game. If the movie was actually good then you should be complaining. It was created to be a complete nightmare, unless you're a fellow fan of the B arts. If you love B then Street Fighter is a very enjoyable experience. Yeah of course it's poorly written and acted with even less fines, but that's the beauty of it. Our only complaint is that it actually made the movie theaters and has close to 200 reviews. We typically go straight to video all the way baby. However in certain cases we will delve into the more well known features if the content fits. It's not one of Van Dammes finest, but really is anything he's done all that fine?

Want Street Fighter (Extreme Edition) (1994) Discount?

It was only a matter or time before the phenomenal video game smash hit was turned into a video game, and when word was out there was to be a live action movie, i don't think anyone really knew what to expect. And once it was out, it made it's money, which was guaranteed, but left a lot of the fans of the game in disappointment at how there favorite video game characters had been portrayed.

To those who never played the game, it was a JCVD movie where he led the U.N against the dictatorship of General Bison with 100 other side characters involved. But to those who just dismiss the movie and give it 2 to 4 word reviews, you really need to stand back and look at just how many characters from the game are portrayed into this film. What was it meant to be? 80 mins of nonstop fighting with special effects coming out of there hands?

I have to say, for the task that was at hand and the plot of the movie, it's not that bad of a job when asking someone to involve so many characters from a video game and incorporate them into a full length motion picture. I mean, this movie was based on Super Street Fighter 2 and that game had about 16 characters in it. It really came down to the casting of certain characters and costumes that really held this movie back.

Jean Claude Van Dame as Cornell William F Guile. I think half the audience liked the idea he played Guile, and the other half would ask why the muscles from Brussels is playing an American military Cornell? As like any JCVD movies, he has his moments of coolness & his moments of complete lameness.

Raul Julia as M. Bison i thought was great casting. Raul really researched dictators like Hitler and Mussolini for this role, and created exactly who Bison was expected to be. I'm not just praising him cause he died just after this movie, no, he is one of the much better actors in this movie that when I think if someone else could have been cast who would be better in this role, then Raul is the one I would say is the #1 choice.

Ming-Na as Chun Li I think did a terrible job. It's not so much she didn't look the part, but I think they could have found someone who looked a better Chun-Li, but also her acting from sarcasm to doing her own lame stunt's that look stupid in the movie (hence that roll she did to put a tracking device on the truck) really make you wonder how she got this role in the first place. She plays the role too goofy in most parts, then when she is supposed to be mean, you just don't buy it.

Wes Studi I think played a great Sagat. He looked the part, and played it straight. Even tho he was not as tall as Sagat should be, it would be very hard to track down a 7'4 kickboxer to play the role.

Jay Tavare I suppose played a decent Vega. Surely there is someone out there that could have done a much better job, but this guy played the character decently and no real complaint about his performance in the movie.

Kylie Minogue playing Cammy was the worst choice of the entire movie. She completely killed the character by having no knowledge what-so-ever of who the heck she was supposed to be portraying. And her accent in the film is just enough to make cringe.

Byron Mann as Ryu was not quite the right choice, tho he could have been better if he was a little darker and not working with Damian Chapa who really did not suit the role of Ken Masters at all. The two of them where not what you expected out of so many SF2 fans favorite characters. Both of them should have been played by people a bit thicker and didn't look like the comic relief from a stoner movie.

Roshan Seth I suppose played Dahlsim as best he could for the way he is written into this movie. Many where disappointed he was not a Yoga master made of rubber shooting flames out his rear end, but for what his role was here, I suppose he did a decent enough job.

Grand L. Bush looked the part of Balrog in some parts of the movie, but he did not seem he was the right choice for the character. Balrog should've been much meaner and bulked up. This guy was far from the right choice.

Peter Navy Tuiasosopo as E.Honda I will say was a good choice to play the role. Even tho he was Hawaiin in the movie, and the video game he is Japanese, not to forget in real life Peter is Samoan, there probably wouldn't have been a lot of Japanese men of this size that could make this character work on screen.

Andrew Bryniarski as Zangief was really horrible choice. It wouldn't have been that hard to find an actual wrestler who stands at about 7 foot in height who looked more the role then this guy does. This guy looks like he is wearing a bad fake beard and wig, and is trying to play the character just as goofy as can be. it really ruins scenes with guys like Raul Julia who give a great performance, and then this guy screws it up with really bad acting.

Gregg Rainwater as T.Hawk, why did they even bother? I'm not even going to go on about this one.

Miguel A. Núñez Jr. as Dee Jay was pretty bad as well, the character was written in badly, so i guess it wouldn't matter who played this role.

Robert Mammone as Charlie (Blanka) again, another one they should have had a beefed up guy play the role of and make him look somewhat credible then just completely stupid.

Kenya Sawada as Captain Sawada what a memorable character this one was not. This was supposed to be the introduction of a new character for the video games Capcom was planning to release in an upcoming SF game, but after the fact no one took any notice of him in this movie, I guess the idea was canned.

So with very few right choices for the roles of the SF characters, you can see why the movie is not praised by fans of SF2 from being the wrong choice of characters. If it had a balance of the right looks for the role, and everyone on the same level from who is going to play the role seriously, and who is going to portray it as a loony tune, then the results may have varied more in the thumbs up favor.

BONUS FEATURES

Boring commentary from the director giving you more information about his background and life then anything to do with the movie.

Trailers to SF4 (big deal)

2 Deleted Scenes that are worthy of looking at.

The trailer (whoopie)

Still, with the negative things I have said about this film, and the things I would have changed, much like Masters Of The Universe, there is just something about the film that makes you want to see it at least once every year or two. It's far from the worst film of all time.

Save 28% Off

Billy Elliot (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy) (2000)

Billy ElliotBeginning with an exuberant title sequence, this charming, offbeat, coming-of-age story revolves around Billy Elliot (Jamie Bell), the younger of two sons of a widower coal miner (Gary Lewis) near Newcastle in Northern England. It's 1984, and the National Union of Mine Workers is engaged in a long, bitter strike, marked by street battles with riot police and protests against the busloads of scabs crossing the picket lines.

Following the family tradition, Billy is expected to learn boxing at the Everington Boys Club where, instead, the 11 year-old becomes enthralled by the girls' dancing class, led by a chain-smoking teacher (Julie Walters) who soon recognizes his raw talent. He loves watching Fred Astaire in old movies and is instantly drawn towards the ballet class, but when his macho father and rabble-rousing brother (Jamie Draven) discover he's taking ballet classes, they ridicule Billy "Lads do boxing and football and wrestling, not friggin' ballet!" forcing him to hide his slippers under the mattress and sneak off to class. Then come the auditions for the Royal Ballet School and Billy's defiantly joyful, foot-stompin' "I Want to Boogie" sequence.

What makes this heartfelt English import such a gem is the collaboration of screenwriter Lee Hall, cinematographer Brian Tufano ("Trainspotting") and former stage director Stephen Daldry ("An Inspector Calls"), who despite the simplistic predictability of the plot create eccentric, lovable characters and evocative imagery. One haunting sequences focuses on a little neighborhood girl dragging a stick along a brick wall, which dissolves into a phalanx of plastic police shields. Another involves the father grimly chopping up Billy's mother's beloved piano for needed firewood. While some of the authentic, heavily accented dialogue may be indecipherable to some, the musical soundtrack, combining classical and pop, is terrific.

In the title role, newcomer Jamie Bell embodies awkward determination, juggling grim reality with a surreal fantasy world, explaining, "Just because I like ballet doesn't mean I'm a pouf!" As Billy's father, Gary Lewis ("My Name is Joe") is tough-yet-tender, and Julie Walters ("Educating Rita") scores as Billy's crusty yet compassionate teacher. ("I feel like a sissy," Billy tells her. "Well, don't act like one," she retorts.) Jamie Draven and Stuart Wells lend strong support. Jean Heywood is touching as Billy's senile grandmother, whom he tenderly cares for and who repeatedly recalls, "I could have been a professional dancer."

While the bleak setting, in the 1984 miners' strike in northeastern England, is reminiscent of "The Full Monty," the energetic mood evokes "Flashdance" and it was a bit hit at both the Toronto and Cannes Film Festivals. On the `Lund Movie Scale' of 1 to 10, "Billy Elliot" is an exhilarating 9. Combining comedy and poignancy, it's all about being able to express yourself.

Jamie Bell is pure magic in this wonderful coming-0f-age film that tells the story of a working class English lad who takes up ballet as a way to hone his boxing skills. In the process, he discovers himself, learnes some valuable life lessons, and fills a deep void left by the death of his beloved mum. Despite his family's strong objections (and financial straits) Billy ends up studying dance from a local teacher (the effervescent Julie Walters, who won an Oscar nomination for her work here). Her lessons both technical and moral serve as the basis for a devastatingly real connection between Billy and his disgusted macho father. What ensues is a dramatic comedy that inspires us at every turn without condescension or pity. The heartening interaction that develops between father and son is truly evocative, especially so for anyone who ever followed (or didn't) their dreams despite their family's objections. Not only does Billy "Dance!!" for his supper...he befriends the local outcast gay teenager and copes with questions about his own sexual orientation heady topics for a movie about a dancing teen. All of this is handled in a mature, thoughtful manner, which makes the film a visceral, haunting experience. You can take or leave it's many messages, but theere is no denying its emotional core.

It's rare for a movie to challenge social mores and values by focusing on the dominant male principals. But "Billy Elliot" succeeds on more levels than other underdog-come-from-behind flicks. First, its based on a true story and resonates with truth, integrity and spirit. And, Bell's brash, authentic portrayal is pure magic. His feet literally take over his soul...he dances in the street, mimmicking Gene Kelly, and in the process taps his way into your heart. The performance is so accomplished it's a wonder Bell didn't receive an Oscar nomination. Even Russell Crowe who won the 2000 BAFTA and Oscar for "Gladiator" admitted Bell deserved the BAFTA Prize instead. Having resisted "Billy Elliot" at the movies, I finally caught it recently on HBO and was taken in immediately. This is a film your entire family can and should enjoy...if they don't, perhaps a little side trip to an English coal-mining town will help them appreciate this wonderful heartwarming film. Seriously, in this day and age, every one of us could use more Billy Elliots and fewer Scorpion Kings. A keeper!

Buy Billy Elliot (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy) (2000) Now

If you love intimate, moving character films like Cinema Paradiso, you will love love love Billy Elliot. A small, rousing British film with cleverly written characters, this movie is both sentimental and expertly crafted. The performances, particularly from Julie Walters as the dance instructor, and that winsome, melancholy but excpetionally gifted boy as Billy, will truly steal your heart. The simple premise is instantly grabbing -an artistic boy, only 11, is unfortunately the most forgotten element in a fractured, sad little family, which includes a pre-Alzheimer's grandmother, an angry older brother and a defeated, sad and tense father. While Dad and bro are on strike, money is tight the year is 1984 at the height of British strike/tensions. Billy is sent to boxing lessons, where, by happenstance, he discovers a true vent for his budding creativity -and especially his joy in dancing. Filled with infectiously appealing pop and light-classical music, this film is part Rocky, part Hollywood musical, part Flashdance and part Cinema Paradiso. The chance that these disparate, unlikely approaches might actually add up to something compelling are unlikely, but you must experience this movie to understand how exciting, moving and intensely gratifying it can be. Painted in bold, creative colors and shot with a springy exuberance, Billy Elliot is terrific.

Read Best Reviews of Billy Elliot (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy) (2000) Here

My son dressed up like Beauty(Belle from Beauty and The Beast...not the concept of beauty) for halloween. He dressed like the Mother Superior when we took him to the sing-along Sound Of Music. The other day he got a superman toy and was putting a Barbie Shoe on it. I am living in the world of the unique child.And I know there will be a day where someone will try to change my son........ This is why I cried in Billy Elliot......This is a beautiful film about being different in an uncompromising world. It is a film about economics and society, and how art is developed through frustration and need...but with all that aside it is a truly entertaining and fabulous film. Stephen Daldry, the reknowned theatre director, makes his debut here. The direction is the thing that gives this it's guts. This is a much better film than it needed to be. And the performances....Julie Walters, Jaime Bell and Gary Lewis(such an amazing performance as the dAd)...Just check this out. The movie goes places that you don't expect, and thankfully, places you do. I have just been thinking about the end of the film, and how it is an ugly duckling story...the coolest thing about it is that more than Billy turn into a swan. It seems like the entire community turns swanish. Art and individuality can do that. I was the quasimodo of ducks before my som came along.

Want Billy Elliot (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy) (2000) Discount?

Billy Elliot is an 11-year-old boy played by Jamie Bell. On his way to a boxing lesson, he happened upon a ballet dancing class. Soon he discovered that he was very good at ballet, and he then wanted to become a dancer despite his family's wishes. This is a really touching and inspirational film about achieving dreams that will leave you cheering!

This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and I have seen quite a few considering that I'm only 14. "Billy Elliot" is very similar to "October Sky", which is another great movie. (Even the kid's dad is a coal miner!) But it is also very different in the way that it is much more complex and subtle. I have noticed that because this is a British movie, it seems to be a lot more daring than most American movies, with a lot of things that Americans might consider extraneous. But that's what I like about it; Every character is so well developed even if they have a very small role (e.g. Billy's supposedly gay friend). These little aspects of these minor characters add a really nice touch to the already powerful story.

Also, DON'T let the R-rating fool you. THIS IS A FAMILY MOVIE. This movie is NOT pornographic, or violent, or chock-full of coke-sniffing. It just contains some language that little kids shouldn't use. Even so, the profanity is used very maturely. It is never gratuitous or unnecessary, it's just how these British people speak. And the film never seems to glorify the use of such language.

This film was WAY overlooked at the Oscars. It's definitely better than "Gladiator". "Gladiator" may have cool combat actoin, but it's got a very straightforward plot which doesn't make you think. I have NO IDEA why Jamie Bell wasn't nominated for his act. He has a very auspicious start in his filom career with this movie!

If there's one thing to criticize about this movie, it's the fact that the dialogue is spoken with heavy British accents, making it hard to understand at times. But that's not enough to keep me from saying that this is one of the best movies I have ever seen! Watch "October Sky" first, to give you an idea of how an American movie tells a dream, then watch "Billy Elliot" for a more sophisticated British idea.

Save 25% Off

Houdini & Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty Jalopies

Houdini & Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty JalopiesFor those shoppers who look at this double-disc Blu-ray price tag and think "It's too good to be true," you're right on one hand and wrong on the other. This Tony Curtis Blu-ray double feature packs a surprising amount of bang for its buck. Both "Houdini" (1953) and "Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty Jalopies" (1969) are presented here on their own single layer Blu-ray discs. The picture quality is surprisingly good for the price, but I'd be lying if I said these were sparkling HD transfers. Both films are 1080P, and "Houdini" appears the best of the two as far as picture quality.

For those unaware, "Houdini' stars married couple Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh, and the story functions as a semi-biographical depiction of the great escapist and magician Harry Houdini. Its an interesting drama with some thrills thrown in, and it's an entertaining film to watch regardless of whether it falls short of genuine "classic" status. However, aside from the great story, its also worth watching simply for the on-screen pairing of Curtis and Leigh. "Houdini" has been released multiple times on DVD, but this edition is likely the best the film will ever look. There are light scratches and skin tones are slightly too red, but the Blu-ray is definitely an improvement over all previous releases. It should be noted that "Houdini" is NOT widescreen and is presented here in its correct aspect ratio of 1.33:1 (aka black bars on the left and right sides of the picture). I can't say much about the film's sound. It seems fine to me, but some audio aficionados will undoubtedly have a problem with the compressed stereo audio. No special features are present, but its hard to complain considering the list price for the product.

On the second Blu-ray disc, we get another Tony Curtis film "Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty Jalopies." While "Houdini" is a drama, "Daring Young Men" is a high octane comedy film that will have some laughing with delight while other viewers may resort to staring at their watch. Its not for everybody, and falls into the same vein as another Tony Curtis film "The Great Race." That said, if you like Tony Curtis and you like a little over-the-top humor, you will enjoy this transnational caper film. Unlike "Houdini," the film was shot in widescreen and is presented here in the correct 2.35:1 ratio. The picture quality with "Daring Young Men" is less consistent than "Houdini" and there is noticeable color fluctuations as well as more scratches and blemishes. However, it still looks quite good, and definitely surpasses the picture quality of its DVD predecessors. Once again, no special features, but that's to be expected with the price tag.

Overall, this 2-disc Blu-ray set offers viewers the chance to view two lesser known Tony Curtis titles in HD form. No, the picture quality isn't perfect, but it certainly look pretty darn good for a pair of non-restored films that most would have never thought would join the HD world. If you already own these two films, it may not be worth upgrading (depending on your own fondness for the two) but its certainly a great deal to take advantage of for those who do not already own these two entertaining titles.

This bluray set is a good buy for fans of Tony Curtis, or older movies in general. Houdini (1953) features Curtis as the legendary magician and escape artist Harry Houdini (1874-1926). Janet Leigh, married to Curtis at the time, appears as Houdini's wife Bess. The film is in color, presented in full screen (1:33 ratio), and remastered for this Bluray release. The second film is an international production, originally titled Monte Carlo Or Bust (1969), but was renamed, Those Daring Young Men In Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969), for release in America. It is a breezy adventure/comedy that follows automobiles driven by teams of drivers entered in a rally race across Europe. Tony Curtis is one of the stars, in a solid ensemble cast that also includes Peter Cook, Terry Thomas, and Dudley Moore. This feature is presented in 1:78 widescreen.

I have reviewed each of these films separately, so this review will covers the Bluray editions.

Released in 1953, Houdini features Tony Curtis in one of his early starring roles, as the young star gives a winning and charming performance. The film hits some of the high points of the magician's colorful life, while embellishing the truth for dramatic purposes. After marrying Houdini, Bess becomes his assistant. Houdini becomes an expert escape artist and illusionist, who eventually travels to England, where he achieves great notoriety and success performing in Europe. Houdini's returns to America, eventually becoming a star in his home country.

The colors in the Bluray release are generally rich and saturated, with a decent amount of sharpness. The tight full screen presentation doesn't look the greatest on a widescreen TV, but if you plan to own the film, the high definition version still has a lot to recommend it. Unfortunately, there are no subtitles.

While not entirely historically accurate, Houdini the movie is quite entertaining, and gets a lot of things right, while building up the mystique surrounding the famous magician. With some impressive set designs, and winning performances from Curtis and Leigh, Houdini rates a solid 4.5 stars.

The auto racing adventure, Those Daring Young Men In Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) co-written by Ken Anakin and Jack Davies, was their follow up to Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines (1965). The sequel was based on the Monte Carlo Rally, and is set in the 1920's. It is mostly a light fun romp, as the racers experience madcap adventures while travelling through England and Europe. A series of goofy incidents with no predictable direction, this is a film where you just go along for the ride. A joint British/French/Italian production, some of the humor reflects certain nationalistic stereotypes, and to some extent satirizes them.

Despite a less than inspiring title, the film is well-paced, with lots of action. The special effects are quite good, with many stunts involving real cars, as well as shots featuring model cars. The colors in the Bluray presentation may not be as vibrant and richly saturated, but sharpness and definition are very good. This is kind of a double edged sword, as the scenes shot on location generally look fantastic, while processed and composited shots may not look as convincing. Rear projection is heavily used for shots involving moving cars, and some scenic background shots. How well this technique holds up varies, as high definition often makes some of the "fakeness" more evident. It's just part of the charm of a film from this era.

Tony Curtis and Susan Hampshire are teamed together as racers. The cast also includes Peter Cook, and Dudley Moore (Arthur) as British Army soldiers. Terry Thomas is Curtis' arch rival, while Gert Frobe (Goldfinger) plays a German criminal, using the race as a cover for smuggling jewels.

Character development is a little skimpy, and the writing is uneven, but for pure 60's whimsy and fluff with very European sensibilities, Those Daring Young Men In Their Jaunty Jalopies is mostly a fun ride. The film looks very good in high definition, the action scenes are solid, and the editing and cinematography are quite good. Unfortunately like Houdini, there are no bonus materials or subtitles.

For those interested in either film, this attractively priced set is worthy of consideration, as each film benefits in different ways from a high definition release.

Buy Houdini & Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty Jalopies Now

Good Value for Two movies.There is no extras.Very good Blu-Ray copies.

A goog laugh.All region 1

Ken Barrett

Mooroolbark.

Vic Australia

Read Best Reviews of Houdini & Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty Jalopies Here

If you enjoyed "Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines" then I'm sure you'll enjoy this film too.

Similar basic plot, replace aeroplanes with cars and the race destination from Paris to Monte Carlo. Then add many of the best comedy actors of the time and a fun script and the result is a film that you can enjoy over and over again.

Also included is a film on the life of Houdini. Not one I have seen before and probably not one I'll watch again. It is an almost superficial account of Houdini's life. OK to watch once or for anyone who has no idea who Houdini was (is that possible?) but that's about all that can be said in it's favour. None the less "Those Daring Young Men in their Jaunty Jelopies" (Known as "Monte Carlo or Bust" in the UK), more than justifies the price.

For those purchasing from the UK both Discs play OK on my UK Blu-ray player.

Want Houdini & Those Daring Young Men and Their Jaunty Jalopies Discount?

Strange pairing and no frills, but two great movies at a rock bottom price. No HD or even multi-channel audio unfortunately, but picture quality passable. Houdini is pan and scan.

Would love to see Jalopies with it's own special release as it has be Terry-Thomas at his finest, an utter cad!

Save 41% Off

Robot Chicken: Dc Special (2013)

Robot Chicken: Dc SpecialI love DC. I buy all the stuff they put out, so I had to check this out.

I was shocked to find the "RC/DC Special" is only 23 minutes long! I had assumed they were going to throw in all their old DC comics sketches, but NOPE... It's just the main 23 minute episode.

Sure, they got two commentaries (with the creators and with the actors) and lots of behind the scenes stuff... but it's still not worth it. If they had thrown in all the other DC jokes they had done before it would have been good, but they didn't.

I feel bad for spending $10 on the DVD, so speading $15 for the bluray is ridiculous. If you ever find it in the $5 bin of your local retailer, it's totally worth the $5, until then... I'd give this a pass.

Robot Chicken's Season 6 premiere last September began with a DC Comics Special. Written by Geoff Johns and regular RC writers, the Special was a fast and, in my opinion, sporadically funny comic spoofery of the Robot Chicken kind. Meaning lots of jokes, of which many that hit and many that fall flat.

As an avid fan of Robot Chicken in general (and owner of every RC season), I was really looking forward to seeing DC Comics Chief Creative Officer and famous comic scribe take on the Robot Chicken 10-minute, rapid-fire skit format and for the most part he succeeded in providing lots of laughs. The in-joke in Bane reappearing to 'break the Bat' in multiple Batman skits is priceless. And so is Aquaman's early floundering (excuse the pun) with his fellow Justice League-ers and later...you'll find out!

In a manner of speaking, Robot Chicken's DC Comics Special is not as funny or memorable as any of the three Star Wars Specials they've aired in years previous (which were AMAZING). Yet the veteran writing skills of Geoff Johns shines through and allows the viewer to get the in-jokes while laughing through most of the special.

The question on your mind just may be: Is Robot Chicken's DC Special worth forking over the cash for? Well, that's up to how dedicated a Robot Chicken viewer you are. If you are a dedicated viewer, then nothing's stopping you for purchasing the 9.99 DVD or 14.96 Blu-Ray. With either the DVD or Blu-Ray format to choose from, it's completely up to you to decide on which platform you prefer (or have).

If you're a casual Robot Chicken viewer, (which is absolutely okay) then I would recommend the purchase as well for the reason that 23 minutes of content, decent Robot Chicken content at that, and 2 hours of Special Features (on both DVD and Blu-Ray, legitimate proof from Entertainment Weekly: that allows you to see their making-of featurette, outtakes, deleted sketches, and even a tour of DC Comics Entertainment from Geoff Johns! On the DVD and Blu-ray extras front, Robot Chicken always delivers.

So, to wrap things up Robot Chicken DC Comics Special is a decent Robot Chicken spoof, in my opinion, of many of DC Comics most revered (and very much lesser revered) comic icons and the many in-jokes/comedy that can be mined from their characters' inconsistencies (over different comic book runs) and traits. For some, once may be enough in terms of viewing the RC DC Comics Special. For others, if this is you, it may be the first of many times! Here's to the upcoming 2nd DC Comics Special delivering on the levels of greatness that the Star Wars Specials reached.

GR

Buy Robot Chicken: Dc Special (2013) Now

As much as I appreciated the new material, they should have added the previous DC Comics parodies that they did. This "Special" was too short to really get any real yuks out of.

Read Best Reviews of Robot Chicken: Dc Special (2013) Here

Robot Chicken, like Saturday Night Live, Lipitor or Cymbalta, is not for everyone. But it's enjoyed significant success. This particular entry in the stop-motion Adult Swim satire series provides quite a notable twist in the ongoing saga of super powers engaged in battle -not superheroes, but entertainment companies with growing portfolios of characters and franchises.

DC has had some bumps along the big-screen freeway to box office and critical success while Marvel is enjoying a measurable edge. However, Warner can spoof their characters to a searing degree. Disney probably would demur to do the same with its properties. It's ironic that Robot Chicken, which hit big with its Star Wars sendup (before Disney bought Lucasfilm), has allowed satire within its own library, from Space Ghost: Coast to Coast to Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law.

Some may take umbrage at how Warner can produce satires of this kind with their classic characters, but the point is in the irony. Robot Chicken is an unapologetically crude, edgy puppet show that is now a six-season series with over 100 episodes. Big name stars do voices and awards have been won. I'm not making an evaluation here, just observing and tilting my head to the side in wonderment.

Members of Robot Chicken's team are also behind Cartoon Network's animated MAD series, which follows the same rhythm, transitional devices and hit-and-miss satire, albeit for a younger audience. MAD does not come near the expletive level of Robot Chicken.

But it's not the use of language that makes this particular entry in the series funny, it's the silliness and the running gags. Aquaman's lack of respect is the show's "through line," as the writers call it on their commentary. I got a kick out of the nod to Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In in the "That's Bane" gags. It's also nice to see Captain Carrot and His Zoo Crew mentioned in a sketch reminiscent of the classic "Chuckles Bites the Dust" episode of the Mary Tyler Moore Show. And let's face it, Mister Banjo steals the show. He should have his own big-budget tentpole CG feature film.

Robot Chicken moves at such a breakneck pace that a lesser gag is forgotten when a greater one follows it, also a "Laugh-In" technique and a luxury that the longer format SNL does not have. Having this episode on DVD bears repeat viewings in order to catch the gags and of course, the more you know the comics, the funnier the jokes. Although it's a half-hour special, there are a lot of bonus features.

As a special note, I have never read a funnier DVD box than the one in which this is packaged. Whoever wrote it deserves props, and those who shepherded it through what is likely a series of corporate approvals is also a superhero. It even has fake prices! I could just imagine someone saying, "If we put a price of 12 cents on the front cover, the public may expect to pay that..."

BONUS FEATURES

1. The Making of the RCDC Special

Even though specific words are bleeped on the special, they are heard here in voice sessions. Apparently the stop motion animation is all done domestically, at least from the way it looks in this segment.

2. Writers' Commentary

Nice explanations of the concepts behind the gags and how the show is structured.

3. Actors' Commentary

It's fun to hear Alfred Molina talk about the British comics he grew up with, as well as his take on doing this show. Guess who Banjo Man is?

5. DC Entertainment: The Tour

Seth Green and other creatives tour the office lobby, research library, toy graveyard, things in storage, video game room, product room, archives and writers room.

PLUS:

6. Aquaman: His DC Special Origin Story

7. Chicken Nuggets (sketch-by-sketch commentary)

8. Stoopid Alter Egos costume wrap party

9. Outtakes

10. Cut sketches: voice sessions and storyboards

Want Robot Chicken: Dc Special (2013) Discount?

So, it's 23 minutes (+2 hours bonus features) for ten bucks. Have to agree with those people who said that it would be nice if those "bonus features" included all of the previous DC Comics character segments from past seasons of Robot Chicken. As it is, the bonus features are two different audio commentaries, a "pop-up" fun-facts version of the special, a behind the scenes feature, and some deleted sketches (not actually filmed; audio with storyboards). So, it depends on how much of a hardcore Robot Chicken and/or DC fan you are whether this will be worth it to you. It's about the same as the RC Star Wars specials in terms of content, so be forewarned.

The one really odd thing I found (as a toy collector and DC fan) in watching this special was the odd mix of classic Mego-style action figures with the regular larger size "DC Universe Classic" (Mattel) figures and "DC Direct" action figures. I wish they had gone either all Mego-style or all modern-style, because mixing the two types together in one sketch gives the viewer a strange feeling of incongruity. Other than that, the material is pretty funny.

Save 15% Off